GI SPECIAL
4H1:
ENOUGH
BRING THEM ALL HOME NOW
U.S. forces take cover as they hear gun shots
while inspecting the site of car bomb, July 30, 2006, in Mosul, Iraq. (AP Photo/Mohammed Ibrahim)
“The Occupation Has Reached A Point Where It
Is ‘Delaying Defeat’”
“Col. Wilkerson Notes That He Has Not
Received A Single Positive Email From Anyone On The Ground In Iraq”
[So, now we know what the
mission is. Now we know what
you’re supposed to die for.
You’re supposed to die to “delay defeat.” You know by now what the troops in Vietnam
did about that proposition. In the words
of the prophet, “Go thou and do likewise.” T]
31 July 2006 By Stirling Newberry, Truthout
Book Review [Excerpts]
Fiasco: The American Military
Adventure in Iraq - the title alone of Thomas E.
Ricks's book is enough to make it shoot to number one on Amazon.com. Ricks has
twice been a member of a reporting team that won the Pulitzer; he has been
covering the military for over 20 years. His recent book is a brutal look at
the bundle of failures in conception, operation and execution that are the
American involvement in Iraq.
On Friday, he was at the New America
Foundation along with Colonel Larry Wilkerson (retired), former chief of staff
at the State Department, at a gathering hosted by Steve Clemons, the director
of the American Strategy Program at NAF.
His conclusion is that Iraq is
in a "civil war," and that the occupation has reached a point where
it is "delaying defeat."
The situation of ground troops has become a
defensive one in which they, in the soldier's own words, "embrace the
suck" as a way of dealing with the unstable personnel situation, the siege
mentality, and the complete lack of real progress.
Col. Wilkerson notes that he
has not received a single positive email from anyone on the ground in Iraq.
When asked about what
"victory" would mean in Iraq, both Ricks and Wilkerson denied that
military victory was even possible.
I've written on root causes of military
failure, the most important the triangle of failure, where the drive for quick
results leads to shock tactics.
These are frustrated by the lack of decisive
battle, producing frustration, which leads to the drive to create body count,
which creates the expectation of some measurable result, such as control of
territory. This in turn drives expectations for quick return on territorial
control.
Ricks's book amply demonstrates how this
triangle has been chased around and around at ever-increasing expense.
What do you
think? Comments from service men and
women, and veterans, are especially welcome.
Send to contact@militaryproject.org.
Name, I.D., withheld on request.
Replies confidential.
IRAQ WAR REPORTS
‘Soldier’s Soldier’ From Arundel
Dies In Iraq Ambush
Army
Staff Sgt. Christopher Swanson
July 27, 2006 By Nia-Malika Henderson, Sun
reporter
On his personal Web site, Army Staff Sgt.
Christopher Swanson called himself "Just a regular Joe," and he
blogged about growing up in the 1990s, and the valor of soldiers and of his
troops.
"They are my life and my family right
now," he wrote on his myspace.com page, which family and friends used to
post word of gatherings and milestones.
"I would do anything for them even if it means giving my life to
save theirs."
On Saturday, Sergeant Swanson, who wrote that
his goal was to bring his soldiers home safe, died in an ambush in Anbar, his
family said yesterday. The southern Anne Arundel County resident was 25.
The Department of Defense had not confirmed
Sergeant Swanson's death as of yesterday evening, but his family was making
funeral preparations.
More than 50 Maryland soldiers
have died in the war in Iraq.
"Chris was a dedicated servant, he was a
leader, and he wanted to be out front," said Glenn Swanson, his
uncle. "He was going to be a career
soldier, that's what it looked liked to us."
It looked that way because
Sergeant Swanson, of Rose Haven, kept serving.
He was on his third tour of Iraq when he was killed,
Public service was something he learned from
his parents - both work in law enforcement - and began years ago.
As a teenager, he traveled on mission trips
with members of First Baptist Church in Upper Marlboro, preaching the gospel on
Florida's beaches and teaching lessons about love, honor and integrity to gang
members in Ohio. In West Virginia, he
helped build part of a church, moving concrete and hammering nails in the
afternoon sun.
At Southern High School in Anne Arundel
County, where he was captain of the soccer team, he was the student who spent
his free period in the principal's office.
Not because he was in trouble, but because he
wanted to help.
"He was always lending a hand, running
errands, sorting mail, making copies," said Carole Nutwell, an
administrative secretary at Southern High. "He was just a really
happy-go-lucky, likable kid."
Toward the end of his junior year, he began
talking about joining the military, said his father, Gary Swanson.
By his senior year, his mind was made up,
even when others tried to dissuade him.
In August 1999, three months after he
graduated from high school, he enlisted. "You don't ever want to let loose
of a child, but it was his decision, and we supported him," said his
father. "He could have chosen any career in life, but this is something
that he wanted, to serve his county."
Sergeant Swanson served in Kosovo as a member
of the 82nd Airborne Division, and was part of the initial assault on Iraq in
March 2003, his uncle said. He returned home in October of that year and was
redeployed a month later.
His third tour began in November last year.
He was awarded two Purple Hearts, his uncle said. The second came about two weeks ago, when he
was injured by an improvised explosive device.
He refused to be sidelined, he wrote his
brother, Kenneth Swanson, after the incident.
His troops needed him.
"Chris' main thing was to be there for
his men, he got them to the places where they needed to be," his uncle
said. "He was a true soldier's
soldier."
With his father, he enjoyed fishing and
following the Ravens and Orioles. His
father said he would leave an empty seat for his son at the games.
"He was every man's dream son, but he
didn't stand out. He was just an average kid, doing what he loved, " he
said. "He's our hero. ... This has brought us to our knees."
Funeral services are planned for 11 a.m.
Tuesday at First Baptist Church in Upper Marlboro. Sergeant Swanson will be buried at Arlington
National Cemetery. Additional survivors include his grandparents, Roger and
Tillie Swanson of Phillippi, W.Va., and Peggy and Conrad C. Sloan of
Zephyrhills, Fla.
U.S. Patrol Attacked In Mashtal;
Casualties Not Announced
July 31, 2006 Xinhua
A makeshift bomb went off at about 9:00 a.m.
(0500 GMT) near a passing U.S. patrol under a bridge in Mashtal neighborhood in
eastern Baghdad, the source said.
It was not clear whether the U.S. troops
sustained any casualties, the source added.
AFGHANISTAN WAR REPORTS
“We Know Perfectly Well That Once We Leave A
Village, The Taliban Come Back”
30 July 2006 By Françoise Chipaux. Le Monde
[Excerpt]
NATO forces risk finding time running against
them, while the Taliban presence has very clearly spread and its influence
progressed. The fight against these rebels and their potential inroads could
thus very quickly overwhelm the will for development, especially if losses in
the ranks of the international forces are significant.
Already, one Canadian soldier back from
patrol acknowledges, "We know perfectly well that once we leave a village,
the Taliban come back."
Assorted Resistance Action
July 29, 2006 (CNN) & Khaleej Times &
July 31, 2006 People's Daily Online & Xinhua & Amir Shah, Canadian
Press
Four Taliban were killed during a three-hour
battle north of the Afghan capital of Kabul after they attacked a police
post. One policeman died and four others
were wounded in that fight.
Taleban insurgents attacked a police
checkpoint in Dand district of Kandahar province. Two policemen were wounded in
the Taleban attack.
Suspected Taliban fighters blocked the road
from Kandahar to Kabul for one hour at Hassan Kariz village of Shagoi district
in Zabul province.
Taliban militants attacked a police post in
Dand district of Kandahar province, and the police fought back robustly, the
spokesman said.
A bomb planted in a car exploded Monday
outside a crowded mosque in eastern Afghanistan, killing at least eight people
and wounding 16, during a memorial service for a mujahedeen commander,
officials said.
The bomb planted in a car targeted the
provincial governor and other senior officials in his administration. Gov. Gul
Agha Sherzai - who has been targeted by bombings before - had driven away from
the mosque minutes before the bomb went off and was unhurt.
The dead included five police and three
civilians.
Witnesses at the scene of the blast said a
vehicle belonging to bodyguards of the provincial governor was damaged by the
bombing.
TROOP NEWS
THIS IS
HOW BUSH BRINGS THE TROOPS HOME:
BRING THEM ALL HOME NOW, ALIVE
The funeral of Marine Cpl. Julian A. Ramon at
Long Island National cemetery, July 29, 2006 in Farmingdale, N.Y. Cpl Ramon
died July 20, 2006 in Al Anbar province, Iraq. (AP Photo/Mary Altaffer)
52% Of Adult Americans Want To See All U.S. Troops
Out Of Iraq Within A Year
July 29th, 2006 By: Glenn Greenwald on
Saturday, Crooksandliars.com [Excerpts]
For almost two years now, polls have
continuously shown that a solid majority of Americans opposes the war in Iraq,
the signature policy of the Bush administration and its followers, and believes
it was a mistake.
But a new analysis of Gallup poll data
reveals that opposition to the war isn’t just substantial, but is greater
than it was for the Korean War, and roughly equal to the opposition Americans
expressed towards the Vietnam War even as late as 1970:
An analysis released today by Frank Newport,
director of The Gallup Poll, shows that current public wishes for U.S. policy
in the Iraq war eerily echo attitudes about the Vietnam war in 1970.
The most recent Gallup poll
this month found that 52% of adult Americans want to see all U.S. troops out of
Iraq within a year, with 19% advocating immediate withdrawal.
In the summer of 1970, Gallup found that 48%
wanted a pullout within a year, with 23% embracing the “immediate”
option. Just 7% want to send more troops now, vs. 10% then.
At present, 56% call the decision to invade
Iraq a “mistake,” with 41% disagreeing.
Again this echoes the view of the Vietnam war
in 1970, when that exact same number, 56%, in May 1970 called it a mistake in a
Gallup poll.
Odious Odierno’s Brutal, Stupid Tactics
Built The Iraqi Resistance Movement;
Now The Worthless Piece Of Shit Goes Back To Iraq
As Second In Command
July 26, 2006 By Michael Hirsh, Newsweek
[Excerpts]
Reading "Fiasco," Thomas Ricks's
devastating new book about the Iraq war, brought back memories for me.
Memories of going on night
raids in Samarra in January 2004, in the heart of the Sunni Triangle, with the
Fourth Infantry Division units that Ricks describes.
During these raids, confused
young Americans would burst into Iraqi homes, overturn beds, dump out drawers,
and summarily arrest all military-age men—actions that made them
unwitting recruits for the insurgency.
For American soldiers battling
the resistance throughout Iraq, the unspoken rule was that all Iraqis were
guilty until proven innocent.
Arrests, beatings and sometimes
killings were arbitrary, often based on the flimsiest intelligence, and Iraqis
had no recourse whatever to justice.
Imagine the sense of helpless
rage that emerges from this sort of treatment.
Apply three years of it and you have one furious, traumatized
population. And a country out of control.
As most U.S. military experts now acknowledge,
these tactics violated the most basic principles of counterinsurgency, which
require winning over the local population, thus depriving the bad guys of a
base of support within which to hide.
Such rules were apparently unknown to the 4th
ID commander, Maj. Gen. Ray Odierno.
The general is a particular and deserving
target of Ricks's book, which is perhaps the most exhaustive account to date of
all that went wrong with Iraq.
Nonetheless—according to
that iron law of the Bush administration under which incompetence is rewarded
with promotion, as long as it is accompanied by loyalty—Odierno will soon
be returning to Iraq as America's No. 2 commander there, the man who will
oversee day-to-day military operations.
Like Ricks, The Washington Post's first-rate
Pentagon correspondent, I don't really fault the soldiers on the ground for the
mistakes made. These young men and women
were in a hellish situation, and as warriors they performed superbly.
But once they began breaking
into Iraqi homes, cool and competent GIs turned into Keystone Kops, pressed
into a counterinsurgency role they'd never been taught.
So the soldiers improvised,
often amateurishly, apparently, according to Ricks, directed by Odierno to kick
down doors.
The American soldiers themselves were aware
of how inane many of their night raids were. Back in January 2004, the unit I
was with jokingly called their raids "Jerry Springers." Why?
Because the intelligence was often based on unreliable sources who had
agendas of their own. "Lots of
times it turns out to be some guy who wants us to arrest another guy who's
interested in the same girl," one soldier told me.
They were more wild goose chases than
military operations.
During one raid someone spotted a picture of
Ayatollah Khomeini, the Iranian revolutionary leader, lying in a pile of
paper. "Who is that?" asked
Capt. Andy Depanais, a young tank commander who would have been in grade school
at the time of the takeover of the U.S. Embassy in Tehran. None of the soldiers seemed to know, but
Khomeini did look suspicious to them.
Never mind that the insurgency, even then,
was mostly Sunni, while the Iranians and Khomeini were Shiite.
"I usually just round up
all the military-age men," Ben Tomlinson, the lieutenant in command of the
platoon, told me. As Ricks writes, this
had become doctrine for all of Odierno's 4th ID.
At one point we burst into a small hotel, or
hostel, whose guests were said to be Iranian-influenced insurgent
sympathizers. Finding none, we moved
onto a house supposedly occupied by the Iraqi hostel owner, arresting him and
his three sons.
One son, I remember, protested that he was a
medical student, and the soldiers riffled through what were clearly
English-language medical textbooks surrounding his bed. No matter, the youth was shoved to the floor.
Another, by appearance the
youngest, was hyperventilating and coughing incessantly, obviously feverish and
ill with some respiratory ailment. On
the floor he went, an American boot to his back.
On the ride back to base, I sat
next to one detainee in a Bradley fighting vehicle. Blood was oozing from his
nose, which appeared to be broken, but he could not wipe it away because his
hands were tied. He was whimpering. Many
like him ended up at Abu Ghraib prison.
And there, even if they weren't
insurgents before—most weren't—many became supporters of the
insurgency.
Back home meanwhile, Defense Secretary Donald
Rumsfeld was still denying there was an insurgency at all. Bush was pretending that angry Iraqis who
might be sympathetic to the insurgency were terrorists of the same ilk as Al
Qaeda.
Odierno, who allowed credit for
Saddam's capture to accrue to him though Special Forces had led the operation,
was suggesting that he was close to defeating the insurgency. "The former regime elements we've been
combating have been brought to their knees,"' Odierno declared two and a half years ago.
Today, despite these disastrous
misjudgments, not only do all these men still have their jobs, some, like
Odierno, are destined to run the future U.S. Army.
But inexorably, month by month, the Bush
administration broadened the war on terror to include ever more peoples and
countries, especially Saddam's Iraq, relying on thinner and thinner evidence to
do so.
And what began as a hunt for a relatively
contained group of self-declared murderers like bin Laden became a feckless
dragnet of tens of thousands of hapless Arab victims like the sons of the
hostel owner in Samarra, the vast majority of whom had nothing to do with Al
Qaeda or terror, just as Saddam had little to do with Al Qaeda, just as the
Iraqi insurgency had little to do with Al Qaeda (at least at the start), just
as Hizbullah has nothing to do with Al Qaeda.
And as the war broadened beyond reason, and the
world questioned the legitimacy of the enterprise, our friends dropped away.
Worse, we have found ourselves
making enemies in the Islamic world faster than we could round them up or kill
them.
The War On Gatorade Comes To Camp Anaconda:
[Reading Between The Lines And The Lies, Looks
Like Supply Problems Getting Worse]
Jul 30 By Rebecca Santana, Associated Press
CAMP ANACONDA, Iraq
Friday, July 28, 2006, 2:17 p.m. local time
One of Command Sgt. Major Lawrence A. Halls
biggest worries in Iraq is Gatorade. Too
much Gatorade, to be precise.
The problem started with making sure the
troops were hydrated in the hot July sun, when the low temperature is still in
the 90s and the high often goes well above 110. And in this case, hydrated doesn’t
mean seven to eight glasses of water a day as is recommended by many beauty
magazines to keep your skin glowing. It
means seven to eight liters of water a day.
But liter after liter of water obviously doesn’t
have a lot of taste to it, so troops like to mix up what they’re
drinking, and Gatorade is an obvious choice.
Then Hall, of the Army's 1st Squadron, 167th
Cavalry, learned that the medical staff is starting to notice an increase in
kidney stones and gall stones in troops.
They believe its because the guys,
and gals, are drinking a lot of Gatorade and at the same time, not getting enough exercise.
So soldiers are encouraged to either exercise
more or drink water instead of Gatorade.
They’re also rationing the amount of
Gatorade troops can pick up at the dining facility to two bottles per person,
whereas in the past, troops could — and often did — fill up every
pocket with a bottle of the green or orange liquid.
Cutting back on the amount of Gatorade also
means fewer convoys on the highways bringing the stuff in and, as a result,
fewer people dying from roadside bomb attacks.
Hall said he didn’t know whether it was
the medical reasons or the aim of limiting convoys that originally led to the
2-bottles per person rule, but the end result has been a Gatorade crackdown.
"Who would have thought that wed come to
Iraq and my biggest problem would be too much Gatorade?" said Hall. "Little things that you would think never
matter, are a big deal around here."
Israeli Armored
Corps Officer Refuses To Kill Lebanese;
Goes To Jail
[Thanks to many people who sent this in.]
There are
other soldiers like Amir who feel the same as he does but they avoid reserve
duty in other, indirect manners, Nitzan stated.
Amir refused to do this and be tried for absenteeism, she explained.
07.30.06 By Hanan Greenberg, Ynetnews.com
& By Amos Harel, Yuli Khromchenko, Lily Galili, Gideon Alon and Yoav Stern,
Haretz
Captain Amir Pastar, called up by army in
recent days to join fighting in Lebanon, declares Sunday he refuses to take
part in war, sentenced to 28 days in military jail. 'He thinks Israel's operation hurts civilians
on both sides,' his girlfriend explains
The Yesh Gvul movement reported
in this regard that it is currently in touch with more than 10 soldiers and officers
who have been called up to serve in Lebanon and decline taking part in the
fighting.
While some of them have answered reserve duty
call-ups and are participating in military training, they have said that they
will not take part in the fighting, according to organization spokesman Yishai
Menuchin.
Pastar, who has been called up in the recent
reserve mobilization, stated that "participating in the war contradicts
the values I was brought up upon."
The officer was sentenced by his regimental
commander after stating he prefers to serve jail time rather then act against
his conscience. Pastar's girlfriend,
Nitzan, told Ynet that "even before he received the induction order he was
contemplating how he would respond. He
has no problem in principle to serve anywhere else, as long as it's not inside
Lebanon."
On Sunday morning, when Pastar found out he
would have to enter Lebanon, he spoke with his subordinates and informed them
he will not take part in the mission. By
evening he faced a disciplinary procedure and was sent to prison.
Pastar's girlfriend said that Amir believes
Israel should not operate inside Lebanon, which is a foreign state. "He thinks it's an act that hurts
civilians and jeopardizes civilians on both sides of the border," she
explained. She also admitted that the
decision not to serve was very difficult and complex in light of the national
consensus regarding the war.
"It's not easy refusing to take part in
this, especially when you're the first one to do so," she said.
Nitzan also said that while Amir gave a lot
of thought to this move, he eventually decided he is willing to go to jail in
order to stay true to his principles.
There are other soldiers like
Amir who feel the same as he does but they avoid reserve duty in other,
indirect manners, Nitzan stated. Amir
refused to do this and be tried for absenteeism, she explained.
In a separate incident a disagreement erupted
between an officer in the armored corps and his commanders.
The officer, who is currently
in compulsory duty, received instructions to help repair a stranded tank near
the south Lebanese village of Maroun Ras.
In view of the fact that the
crew of the tank was not inside, the officer was convinced that sending
soldiers to fix the tank in daylight would unnecessarily place his men at risk.
Eventually, the officer's
commanders yielded and the repair was carried out during night hours, without
the difference of opinion reaching the level of refusing a military order.
VICTORY!
“HOPE
TO SEE YOU IN COURT
MR BLAIR, YOU
AND BUSH LIED”
[This is a message to Americans from Rose
Gentle. Her son Gordon was killed in
Iraq. She leads a campaign to bring all
the Scots and other troops home from Iraq, now.
T]
From Rose Gentle
To: GI Special
Sent: July 31, 2006
Subject: victory
FAMILIES OF FOUR SOLDIERS
KILLIED DURING |