December 24, 2007
No one was surprised by the guilty verdict against Saddam Hussein in the sham court because of the knowledge
this was a foregone conclusion. However, the appeals court outdid itself by ruling on the Iraqi vice president, Taha Yasin
Ramadan. He was sentenced to life in prison by the court that convicted Saddam, but the appeals court took it upon itself
to change the sentence to death, even though the case was not on the docket.
From the first day Saddam Hussein stepped foot in court until the day he was hanged, the entire system was
stacked against him. Many of the laws the court made for itself were illegal in the eyes of international law and the court
even breached some of its own illegal decrees.
Three defense lawyers were assassinated: Sadoun al-Janabi in October 2005; Adel Muhammad al-Zubaidi in November
2005; and Khamis al-Obeidi in June 2006. In addition, another defense lawyer, Thamir al- Khuzaie, was seriously injured in
the attack on al-Zubaidi. No one has been charged with these murders, but fingers point to Iraqi officials friendly with the
Mahdi Army, the armed militia affiliated with Moktada al-Sadr, or the Mahdi Army directly. Because of the close relationship
of al-Sadr’s group and the stooge Iraqi officials in Baghdad, it is highly unlikely that an arrest will ever occur.
Dr. Curtis Doebbler, a noted international human rights attorney, was on Saddam’s legal team from the
start. Shortly after the announcement of the appeals court, he stated:
We’re trying to point out that if an execution takes place, it will be an ex-judicial, arbitrary execution
outside the law in violation of the law. It’s somewhat ironic that this individual who will be executed has proven to
have much more integrity than the individuals who are executing him, including the U.S. president who exhibits more evidence
that he has committed crimes against the Iraqi people than there was against the president of Iraq in the first trial in which
he was brought before the U.S.-created court and there still has been no investigation of the U.S. president.
As you’ve seen, the Iraqi president has maintained his dignity and also maintained his peace of mind
in belief that he personifies the will of the Iraqi people to continue to fight against this occupation, which they believe,
and the majority of the international community believes, is illegal and the consequence of the illegal invasion of Iraq.
It’s quite a sad day, I think, for international justice and, unfortunately, an another example of how
the United States is unwilling to conform with international law; to show respect for international law. What hurts me the
most, as an American, is that we’re the ones who benefit the most from respecting that law. When we set this example,
we essentially tell people that the law cannot be used to try to get the United States to respect their rights. They have
to use other means. That’s what got us into many of the problems that we’re in today.
After the appeals verdict, almost everybody in the U.S. was in the lynching mood. Pundits were frothing at
the mouth when they discussed the upcoming execution. There was a collective air of jubilation and even former anti-war activists
cheered on the impending hanging. Many politicians of the Democratic party who jumped on the anti-war and anti-Bush wagon
said that Saddam "deserved it." Not one discussed the legality or fairness of his trial. Leftist journalists were trying to
outdo each other in demeaning Saddam. Not only were they reporting the standard fare of Saddam Hussein myths, they made up
new fables of atrocities.
Many people have stated that George Bush lied about everything to do with Iraq: weapons of mass destruction;
the Bin-Laden/Saddam Hussein link; Iraqi involvement with 9-11; fictitious biological weapons trailers; the Iraqi imprisonment
of a U.S. pilot since 1991, etc. Yet, the same people who question Bush’s lies about Iraq, broadcast the myths about
Saddam Hussein and his regime. If Bush had lied about everything else, why should one believe his statements about the Ba’ath
Party and Iraq’s president? Logic would argue that he lied about Saddam as well.
The scenario did not make sense. The people who consistently made the most absurd and untrue statements about
Iraq (Bush, Cheney, Rice, Bremer, Powell, Rumsfeld, et al) and stole tens of billions of dollars that belonged to the country
of Iraq, proudly spoke of creating a new Middle East or were conducting book-signing tours for their memoirs. The results
of their lies led to the killing of more than a million Iraqis since March 2003; at a cost of more than a trillion dollars
to the U.S. public; and the destruction of a country’s culture and infrastructure. Even the history of Iraq was re-written
by people in Washington D.C.
On the other hand, the guy with the moustache who told the truth about all the lies and adhered to the U.N.
request for inspections, as well as supplied a 12,000-page report that documented in detail every aspect of Iraq’s former
WMD programs, sat in a jail cell awaiting execution.
On December 14, 2006, the Iraq Center for Research and Strategic Studies (ICRSS) released the results of a
poll it conducted over several weeks. The ICRSS is an independent organization based in Baghdad and run by Sadoun Dulaimi,
an Iraqi expatriate until 2003. Using a base of more than 2,000 Iraqis, the majority of whom were Shi’ite Moslems, 90%
stated that the country was far better off under Saddam Hussein than it was in 2006.
The ICRSS is definitely not a shill for the Ba’ath Party. U.S. government agencies as well as many media
outlets referenced its results over the years. The conclusions showed a dramatic difference between the opinions of the Iraqi
people and those put forth by the U.S. administration and media.
From the announcement of the guilty verdict on November 5, 2006 until 6:00am on December 30, 2006, Saddam
Hussein was the freest man in Iraq although he was behind bars. His mind was clear and he awaited death with dignity. Not
once did he crack under torture or pressure.
Other leaders, such as Moammar Gadhafi and Manuel Noriega did succumb to U.S. pressure. Gadhafi, once a revolutionary,
is nothing more than the head inspector of the transfer of his country’s oil to the petroleum-guzzling nations. He no
longer has a grand view of society. He may not be in jail, but he is a slave.
Noriega quickly began singing when the U.S. put on the pressure. He admitted to drug trafficking, despite
the U.S. being his partner. And, he made a big deal of stating that he had found Jesus after he was incarcerated. He was a
slave behind bars.
Saddam Hussein was not a slave, although his incarceration kept him imprisoned. He was not allowed to see
his family, unless, like his sons and grandson, they were shot to death with hundreds of bullets.
At 6:00am, Baghdad time, on December 30, 2006, a mere four days after the appeals court ruling, Saddam Hussein
was hanged. Until the lever was pulled, he displayed courage and integrity. The U.S. had waited since 1990 for Saddam to admit
defeat or show any sign of capitulation or fear. He never did.
The hanging was the last chance for the U.S. to attain its goal. Administration members hoped he would cringe
or show fear. Just the opposite occurred. Saddam went to the gallows and refused to wear a hood over his head, although his
hangmen were hooded.
A sanitized version of the execution was broadcast to the world. It showed the hangmen putting a noose around
Saddam’s neck and then the hanging. There was no sound. Shortly after, a real view of the execution came forth. Someone
in the room recorded the event on a cell phone.
In the crowd were hecklers. They taunted Saddam Hussein, yet he never allowed himself to be degraded. When
one of the executioners shouted, "Long live Muqtada al-Sadr," Saddam mocked the Shi’ite upstart, then he began to recite
an Islamic verse and the hangman pulled the plug.
The final act in the U.S. vendetta against Saddam Hussein backfired. The western media reported it as an accomplishment,
but people worldwide took to the streets in protest. Millions in India and Brazil demonstrated. Most of the Arab world was
laden with protestors. National days of mourning were announced and even Muammar Gadhafi of Libya, not exactly a close comrade
of Saddam, announced his country would erect a statue in his commemoration.
The last 15 minutes of his life made Saddam Hussein the ultimate resister of imperialism to hundreds of millions
of people on the Earth. The word "martyr" was now common in describing him.
In the U.S., a few video clips of people celebrating in Sadr City were shown on television. However, no clips
of the massive pro-Saddam demonstrations made it past the cutting room floor. What most Americans do not realize is that Saddam
Hussein was not perceived in much of the world as the ghastly perpetrator of genocide and the brutal sadist that was written
about him in the West. After his hanging, massive numbers of people throughout the Arab world, from Palestine, Egypt, Syria,
Jordan, Lebanon, Yemen and other nations, showed their admiration of the fallen president. Outside the area, Russians, Chinese,
Pakistanis, Indians and many others paid tribute. Even England had various groups hold commemorative ceremonies.
Saddam Hussein held a 90% approval rating almost four years after his country was destroyed by an illegal
invasion but he was hanged, while the U.S. president who was obsessed with the Iraqi president’s demise, and who at
the time had an approval rating of 28% of his own country-people, is still alive and ordering the murder of many more Iraqis.
There are various reasons for these macabre and illogical turn of events. Vilified by Western analysts, politicians
and journalists for years, it is nothing short of miraculous that Saddam lasted as long as he did. Many of the left are just
as responsible for his death as are the neocons they lambaste. Scribe-after-scribe demeaned Saddam Hussein since 1990, most
of the time relaying lies and myths about the man and his Ba’ath Party. No lie was too big if it was sensational enough
to acquire headlines. Even when some of the lies were uncovered, such as those of the human shredding machine, or the mobile
biological weapons labs, or the aluminum tubes for Iraq’s non-existent nuclear weapons program, the press did not acknowledge
the truth. They went along making up new allegations. Because it normally took months to investigate the falsehoods, when
the truth emerged, the public read little. To them, the original story stuck in their minds. Many people should be considered
murderers for Saddam Hussein’s hanging: not just the hangman, but everyone who fueled the fire of hatred against him,
including members of the "progressive" press who helped pass on the lies.
The events leading up to Saddam’s execution are preposterous, almost surreal. A bunch of one-time Iraqis,
who had not lived in the country for decades, were flown into Iraq by the U.S. to run the country. A bible-toting, combat-boot-wearing
administrator with no knowledge of any Arab country or culture (Paul Bremer), changed the country’s laws and constitution,
as well as took away state-ownership of crucial industries.
When the Ba’athist agenda took hold in the 1970s, the government introduced many revolutionary aspects
to Iraqi life: the equality of women; universal education; universal healthcare; much-improved public transportation; emphasis
on science, etc. By the 1980s, Iraq was thriving and the crown jewel of the Middle East. But, along with the improvements
came jealousy and greed. The U.S., because of its no-questions-asked affinity to Israel, had to take Iraq back a few notches.
Oil was quickly becoming a symbol of world power, not just something to keep a country’s energy requirements in place.
In other words, Iraq was now worth fighting for. It no longer was the antiquated nation of a few decades ago.
Saddam Hussein was the driving force behind the transformation of Iraq. Gradually, the U.S., with other Western powers, wanted
some of Iraq’s black gold. Little-by-little, the country was degraded, beginning on January 17, 1991. Twelve years of
an embargo weakened it further, but it did not kill Iraq. It took a massive invasion in 2003 and a ruthless occupation to
finish the country off.
Today, Iraq has been totally destroyed, not just physically, but emotionally. All of Saddam Hussein’s
enemies hold equal responsibility in the destruction. They not only murdered Saddam, but Iraq as well. Shortly after March
2003, some people and institutions, such as Ahmed Chalabi and Haliburton, made a quick financial killing. Those days are gone.
Today’s thieves in the stooge government can only count on small change to steal. The Iraqi people have had everything
they own, physically and emotionally, stolen.
After Saddam’s execution, the press had a field day in analyzing and editorializing the incident as
well as Saddam himself. Most were writing well out of their league and their ignorance of history showed. Because most U.S.
readers do not know the history of Iraq, the scribes’ words were taken as true.
The theme of many articles was that justice was not achieved because Saddam was hanged for a lesser crime
than the major ones assessed against him. The "progressive" writers wanted to see him tried for gassing incidents so they
could tie together U.S. involvement with the "misdeeds" of Saddam Hussein. Article-after-article mentioned Rumsfeld’s
visit to Iraq in the 1980s and said the U.S. gave Iraq the technology for Iraq’s WMD programs. Also, many pundits mentioned
that Saddam Hussein was once a CIA asset. Again, they did not research the matter: Saddam Hussein was never on the CIA payroll.
Once the U.S. had implemented its occupation of Iraq in 2003, CIA spokespeople stated that there was never a CIA-Saddam link.
They no longer needed to keep the oft-stated rumor alive: a rumor that hurt Saddam Hussein’s standing in the eyes of
the Arab people.
No one questioned the reason for the war. They all blamed it on Saddam and wrote as if Iran was a benign and
aggrieved country. Also, not one writer mentioned that Saddam was quickly hanged before the gassing incidents could come to
court. Many people accuse Iran, not Iraq of gassing the Kurds at Halabjah. If Saddam was dead, these items could not be addressed,
so the truth behind the myth of "gassing his own people" went to the grave with Saddam. Further, not one mentioned that Saddam’s
Iraqi attorney, Khalil al-Dulaimi, who was the only defense lawyer able to speak in the courtroom, had been approached twice
in the previous year by Iranian agents who tried to persuade him not to mention Halabjah at the trial. On his first encounter,
in Jordan, he was offered $10 million to keep the subject off the agenda. Later, in Paris, the Iranians upped the ante by
offering him $100 million. The only way to keep the subject away from public scrutiny was to kill Saddam on bogus charges.
Shortly after he died, the court dropped the genocide charges against Saddam Hussein.